Keeping an eye on blogs, citizen media,citizen journalism, citizen reporters and anything about technology that's news for the news business since 2002. Acting locally in Chicago, thinking globally.
Sunday, October 31, 2004
Saturday, October 30, 2004
Friday, October 29, 2004
Two-dozen websites belonging to Indymedia, a "democratic media outlet for the creation of radical, accurate and passionate tellings of truth," and one of the most well-known "alternative media" organisations were shut down for six days recently. "To date not 'The New York Times', the 'Washington Post' or the 'Los Angeles Times' have seen fit to comment upon it," says Downing. (note: John DH Downing, director of the Global Media Research Centre at Southern Illinois University) "In their cases, it is a classic instance of the selective ethics that permeate corporate mainstream media, and that give the blunt lie to their professions of 'all the news that's fit to print,' the vital role of independence from the state, the scandals of censorship. Nauseating hypocrisy!" he adds.There is a very good summary of the Sinclair Broadcasting debacle in USA Today that shows how blogs can do what mainstream journalism can't or won't and makes a good case for the symbiotic relationship of professional and citizen reporters.
Two-dozen websites belonging to Indymedia, a "democratic media outlet for the creation of radical, accurate and passionate tellings of truth," and one of the most well-known "alternative media" organisations were shut down for six days recently. "To date not 'The New York Times', the 'Washington Post' or the 'Los Angeles Times' have seen fit to comment upon it," says Downing. (note: John DH Downing, director of the Global Media Research Centre at Southern Illinois University) "In their cases, it is a classic instance of the selective ethics that permeate corporate mainstream media, and that give the blunt lie to their professions of 'all the news that's fit to print,' the vital role of independence from the state, the scandals of censorship. Nauseating hypocrisy!" he adds.There is a very good summary of the Sinclair Broadcasting debacle in USA Today that shows how blogs can do what mainstream journalism can't or won't and makes a good case for the symbiotic relationship of professional and citizen reporters.
Two-dozen websites belonging to Indymedia, a "democratic media outlet for the creation of radical, accurate and passionate tellings of truth," and one of the most well-known "alternative media" organisations were shut down for six days recently. "To date not 'The New York Times', the 'Washington Post' or the 'Los Angeles Times' have seen fit to comment upon it," says Downing. (note: John DH Downing, director of the Global Media Research Centre at Southern Illinois University) "In their cases, it is a classic instance of the selective ethics that permeate corporate mainstream media, and that give the blunt lie to their professions of 'all the news that's fit to print,' the vital role of independence from the state, the scandals of censorship. Nauseating hypocrisy!" he adds.There is a very good summary of the Sinclair Broadcasting debacle in USA Today that shows how blogs can do what mainstream journalism can't or won't and makes a good case for the symbiotic relationship of professional and citizen reporters.
Wednesday, October 27, 2004
- GOS=General operations "keep the lights on"
- Project funding-within proj funding make budget-like list of what you need and how much its going to cost. Make it specific for the asks--we need blah,blah bathroom fixtures.
- In-kind support can be easier than getting money outright Clear your asks with Lona and Tamara because they know what corporations Columbia has connections with already. Share w/their office.
- Corporations--big ones w/structure, under the radar" w/mushy guidelines where it helps if you have a connection with the organization,non-structured small business--these are like in No. Mayfair and working with Marie's.
- Barriers Communications, finding resources, getting external support.
- 80% of giving is from indivs, the rest is foundations and corporations
- GOS=General operations "keep the lights on"
- Project funding-within proj funding make budget-like list of what you need and how much its going to cost. Make it specific for the asks--we need blah,blah bathroom fixtures.
- In-kind support can be easier than getting money outright Clear your asks with Lona and Tamara because they know what corporations Columbia has connections with already. Share w/their office.
- Corporations--big ones w/structure, under the radar" w/mushy guidelines where it helps if you have a connection with the organization,non-structured small business--these are like in No. Mayfair and working with Marie's.
- Barriers Communications, finding resources, getting external support.
- 80% of giving is from indivs, the rest is foundations and corporations
- GOS=General operations "keep the lights on"
- Project funding-within proj funding make budget-like list of what you need and how much its going to cost. Make it specific for the asks--we need blah,blah bathroom fixtures.
- In-kind support can be easier than getting money outright Clear your asks with Lona and Tamara because they know what corporations Columbia has connections with already. Share w/their office.
- Corporations--big ones w/structure, under the radar" w/mushy guidelines where it helps if you have a connection with the organization,non-structured small business--these are like in No. Mayfair and working with Marie's.
- Barriers Communications, finding resources, getting external support.
- 80% of giving is from indivs, the rest is foundations and corporations
- GOS=General operations "keep the lights on"
- Project funding-within proj funding make budget-like list of what you need and how much its going to cost. Make it specific for the asks--we need blah,blah bathroom fixtures.
- In-kind support can be easier than getting money outright Clear your asks with Lona and Tamara because they know what corporations Columbia has connections with already. Share w/their office.
- Corporations--big ones w/structure, under the radar" w/mushy guidelines where it helps if you have a connection with the organization,non-structured small business--these are like in No. Mayfair and working with Marie's.
- Barriers Communications, finding resources, getting external support.
- 80% of giving is from indivs, the rest is foundations and corporations
- GOS=General operations "keep the lights on"
- Project funding-within proj funding make budget-like list of what you need and how much its going to cost. Make it specific for the asks--we need blah,blah bathroom fixtures.
- In-kind support can be easier than getting money outright Clear your asks with Lona and Tamara because they know what corporations Columbia has connections with already. Share w/their office.
- Corporations--big ones w/structure, under the radar" w/mushy guidelines where it helps if you have a connection with the organization,non-structured small business--these are like in No. Mayfair and working with Marie's.
- Barriers Communications, finding resources, getting external support.
- 80% of giving is from indivs, the rest is foundations and corporations
- GOS=General operations "keep the lights on"
- Project funding-within proj funding make budget-like list of what you need and how much its going to cost. Make it specific for the asks--we need blah,blah bathroom fixtures.
- In-kind support can be easier than getting money outright Clear your asks with Lona and Tamara because they know what corporations Columbia has connections with already. Share w/their office.
- Corporations--big ones w/structure, under the radar" w/mushy guidelines where it helps if you have a connection with the organization,non-structured small business--these are like in No. Mayfair and working with Marie's.
- Barriers Communications, finding resources, getting external support.
- 80% of giving is from indivs, the rest is foundations and corporations
Friday, October 22, 2004
To:> > From: "Katie Malinski" > > Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2004 20:28:15 -0500 > > Subject: [V] Fw: [AustinMamas] FW: Electronic voting problems in > > Austin > > Yesterday a friend voted early at a polling > > location in Austin. She voted straight Democratic. When she did > > the final check, lo and behold every vote was for the Democratic > > candidates except that it showed that she had voted for Bush/Cheney > > for president/vice pres. > > She immediately got a poll official. On her vote, it was > > corrected. She called the Travis County Democratic headquarters. > > They took all her information. They told her that she wasn't the> > first to report a similar incident and that they are looking into > > it. > > So, check before you leave the polling booth, and if anything is > > wrong, get it corrected immediately. > > Report any irregularities to your local Democratic headquarters. > > Go Kerry/Edwards. Let's win this election fair and square! > >
Thursday, October 21, 2004
My elderly parents requested and received mail-in ballots, which elderly or disabled persons are allowed to do. They were completely taken aback, however, when they received in the mail the exact same punch ballot that you use in the voting booth. They are expected to figure out which numbers to select and punch out the tiny little rectangular chads by hand, without the benefit of the template given by the voting booklet in the voting booth. Furthermore, the instructions say that it is a misdemeanor for anyone to help them vote unless they are physically unable to punch the ballot or unless they cannot see to punch the ballot. I don’t know about you, but I think it is ridiculous to expect elderly and disabled people to be able to vote using this method. In my opinion, this is tantamount to denying them the right to vote. Priya Hudson-DiTraglia
Tuesday, October 19, 2004
Monday, October 18, 2004
Monday, October 11, 2004
Saturday, October 09, 2004
Friday, October 08, 2004
Thursday, October 07, 2004
Wednesday, October 06, 2004
Monday, October 04, 2004
And, from Gallup's own website, their FAQ on surveys and polls. Frequently Asked Questions
Saturday, October 02, 2004
In grad school, I studied statistics and how to use them and how not to use them with professors like Houston Stokes and Herb Walberg. The current state of reporting on political polls has raised several red flags for me.
The way margin of error and confidance interval are bandied about often presents a "winner" in a poll that really shows a tie. This CJR article has a fascinating look at Canadian reporting on polls, where more information about how the poll can accurately be interpreted is included.
Another troubling issue that I am just beginning to track was brought to me by a student who works for a local radio station. In Illinois, the Senate race and Presidential race were initially reported to be very one-sided, and essentially, not contested or in doubt. This was causing local broadcasters (radio and television) to feel they were having a revenue shortfall owning to a dearth of political ads. The curious student asked if radio or television stations could sponsor polls to make the predicted outcome of certain races appear closer than they really are.
Using legitimate sampling techniques such as stratified samples, pollsters certainly can conduct a poll where data isn't manufactured, but where the basic assumptions of the sample render the results meaningless or misleading. Without proper explanation of the underpinnings of sampling, of margin of error and confidence intervals, the reporting of such poll results would be biased and unfair whether that was deliberate or based on sloppy reporting. Anyway, this article provides a basis for understanding how error of measure and confidence interval ought to be presented to one's audience. More on this topic to follow. CJR Campaign Desk: Archives